Theoretical Frameworks for Hookup Analysis
An interdisciplinary biopsychosocial model can synthesize typically disconnected theoretical views and offer a far more holistic understanding of hookup culture. Hatfield et al. (in press) suggest that
Even though many scholars stress social facets as well as others stress evolutionary facets, increasingly most have a cultural and biopsychosocial approach—pointing out that it’s the connection of tradition, social context, individual experience, and biological factors that shape young people’s attitudes and willingness to be involved in casual intimate encounters. Which of the facets end up being most significant is determined by tradition, character, sex, and social context. (pp. 3– 4)
Some empirical studies of hookup behavior also have advocated multifactorial approaches (Eshbaugh & Gute, 2008; Garcia & Reiber, 2008).
Using two midlevel theories, Fisher et al. (2012) explained that “parental investment theory is a good example of an ultimate amount of description, while social part concept is a good example of a level that is proximate although each results in the exact same prediction” (p. 47). They argued that development are many useful in examining the reproductive motive, and intimate scripts might be beneficial in examining the social discourse agenda. This is certainly, evolutionary biology influences why rising grownups take part in uncommitted intercourse as well as the means teenage boys and women respond to these encounters (ultimate level explanations). During the exact same time, social functions and sexual scripts influence how emerging grownups navigate their desires in a specific socio-cultural context (proximate degree explanations).